Cheetah90 added a comment.
Thanks for your response Jan!
> Why would it need to? If the information that chocolate contains caffeine is
> contained in the article "Information that needs to be moved to the correct
> article" but neither in the Chocolate nor Caffeine article then the AI could
> extract that information without knowing anything about sub-article
> relationships.
Sorry I am not quite sure I understand it completely. Do you mean there is an
article named "Information that needs to be moved to the correct article" for
all Wikipedia content? If so, we will need to
1. correctly identify those information
2. filter out the information that are describing Chocolate or caffeine
(depending on which is the main article that is searched by AI)
> It says Caffeine -> History of Caffeine -> Discovery and spread of use of
> Caffeine -> History of chocolate, which seems to fit your definition, thus
> not a false positive.
Even this relationship is true, I think History of chocolate is not a sub
article to Discovery and spread of use of Caffeine by the definition of
Template:Main. This is because the Discovery and spread of use of Caffeine does
not summarized this History of chocolate article. {See Also} or {Further
information} seems more appropriate to describe this relationship.
How about the multilingual example that I gave? Is that a valid point to bring?
Thanks
Allen
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Lydia_Pintscher, Cheetah90
Cc: Cheetah90, JanZerebecki, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, StudiesWorld, aude,
Halfak, Wikidata-bugs, Mbch331
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
