At 18:10 28/03/2012, Ivan Herman wrote:
Obviously, you all expect me to agree with Martynas, in view of my
job, and I do:-). But I do not only because I work for W3C, but I
indeed genuinely believe that reinventing things here may be way too
costly on long term...
Note also that W3C may start a new group later this year that would
look at a 'lower' level HTTP protocol to manage (read and write) RDF
data without necessarily using SPARQL. This may be useful for the
project as well.
Ivan
On Mar 28, 2012, at 18:02 , Martynas Jusevicius wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been reading some of the technical notes on Wikidata, for example
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Nikola_Smolenski/Wikidata#Query_language
I would suggest that at this stage we need to have a comprehensive
understanding of all the possible options.
1.Has someone published as page listing the best *summary*
documenting and argumenting each of the existing options. I suppose
we will want a table indicating which existing solution answers which
listed need?
2. Since we have a W3C expert: what is the best document/book to get
a comprehensive and clear (not too massive) documentation on the semantic web?
3. What are the relations with the JTC1/SC32/WG2? Is investing time
in their documents appropriate?
Thank you!
jfc
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
