The label and the description together are meant to be identifying. I.e. "Georgia - A country in central Asia", or "Frankfurt - A city in Hesse, Germany", etc.
Additionally, the Wikipedia links provide quite some guidance to it. Cheers, Denny 2012/4/5 Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.haged...@gmail.com> > > Wikidata can (and probably will) store information about each moon of > > Uranus, e.g., its mass. It does probably not make sense to store the > mass of > > "Moons of Uranus" if there is such an article. It does not help to know > that > > the article "Moons on Uranus" also talks (among other things) about some > > moon that has a particular mass: you need to know what *exactly* you are > > talking about to exploit this data. An article on "Moons of Uranus" could > > still (eventually) embed Wikidata data to improve its display, but this > data > > must refer to individual moons, not to the article as a whole. > > The problem I see is that you have no definition to which real object > the data are tied. We agree that the problem is not the interwiki > links per se. It is what results from it. How do we tie data to a > wikidata page when we don't know what it is about? > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > -- Project director Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
