Hoi,
I am not to judge what conferences will be deemed relevant for an item in
Wikidata. When a conference is relevant, it is the talks and particularly
the registrations of the talks, the papers and the presentations that make
the conference relevant after the fact.
Is Wikimania relevant? Absolutely. Do the Wikimanias have their own items;
they do and nothing changed there.Is it relevant because of it being a
Wikimedia "thing"? That it is as well and as I have said on a different
mailing list as a community we are exceedingly bad in recognising what we
do and have done.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 31 July 2016 at 16:33, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de>
wrote:
> Am 31.07.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
> > Hoi,
> > Really? It is a source for the talks that were given. It contains the
> papers
> > that were the basis for granting a spot on the program.
>
> To clarify - would the same apply for any talk at any conference? Or do you
> think Wikimania schould be especially relevant to Wikidata, because it's a
> Wikimedia thing?
>
> --
> Daniel Kinzler
> Senior Software Developer
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland
> Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
