On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, 12:11 AM Amirouche Boubekki, < amirouche.boube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Again, we're not sure. Of course, reducing the load (both in terms of > edits on Wikidata and of reads on WDQS) will help. But not using those > services makes them useless. > > What about making the lag part of the service. I mean, you could > reload WDQS periodically, for instance daily, and drop the updater > altogether. Who needs to see the updates live in WDQS as soon as edits > are done in wikidata? > I think Wikidata editors are the ones that really need up-to-date query results as a form of feedback (e.g., to check if imports are okay or QuickStatements batches are done right). It might make sense to explore having two WDQS instances: 1. Public instance that is only updated daily or even weekly 2. Community instance that is up-to-date and where you need to log-in with your Wikimedia user account and therefore we can control access to via whitelisting or blacklisting >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
