On Dec 28, 2008, at 3:27 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote: > > The sole useful alternative view, would be that *both* report and > counter-report are secondary sources. > The simple fact that a person is speaking about their own work, > doesn't make > their words primary for that, it depends on the context in which > they are > speaking. > > I.E. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
For the most part, we'd treat anything by Person X as a primary source for [[Person X]]. I mean, if we want to make an explicit exception for a category, that's fine, but right now, nothing I can see in NOR even slightly undermines the idea that an article by Person X is a primary source for [[Person X]]. -Phil _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
