There is the problem that Derrida mostly wrote deliberately inscrutable nonsense.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Carcharoth <carcharot...@googlemail.com>wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Carcharoth wrote: > >> Can't see the word spoiler in the subject line here... > > > > No, it's about a rule abuse which combines the status quo rule with the > need > > for consensus to make changes: you're not supposed to make a change for > which > > there is no consensus, but if you manage to do so anyway, everyone's > stuck with > > it since there's also no consensus for changing it back. > > > > I pointed out that this particular abuse was used to remove spoiler > warnings > > too. > > Yes, and I was pointing out that David and others should stick to the > topic of the thread. As you said, you did (just), but then my post > wasn't in reply to your post. It was a reply to David's post. I go as > off-topic as anyone, but I've seen what happens when threads get > hijacked to discussing spoilers... > > Carcharoth > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
