And we shall all hold hands and love one another, right? You obviously have no consideration for fairness and accuracy.
I will raise this issue for as long as it takes. You can return to your apathy now. For everyone else, take my angry diatribes seriously and verify the accusations I am making. the article with 40 citations that was speedy deleted remains here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article Bill ________________________________ From: Tris Thomas <t...@waterhay.co.uk> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:40:53 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Forum Earlier today I was actually relatively supportive of your issue. You, with your last few posts, have turned me against it. I won't try & stop it being put on again, but there will be no more support from my end. Firstly, this isn't an administrators mailing list, I've only been a member for a few days-my username is dottydotdot & I can still participate fully. Just because not many people have replied to your stuff about Cabal doesn't give you the right to get angry & start swearing on what was a perfectly civil mailing list. I highly doubt you will get any support from anyone on this mailing list now, people who once might have supported you. Please don't bother to continue your diatribe. Thank you. :-) On 09/04/2009 21:27, Bill Carter wrote: > Wikipedia Review will make me feel right at home? You mean they'll address > this issue which none of you Wikipedia administrators intend to, particularly > David Gerard? What's the fucking point of you guys being administrators when > you won't address important issues? Since when is it okay to speedy delete a > new article re-created with the intentions of addressing all of Wikipedia's > notability demands? You guys are running a reckless website and actually > receive a deserved amount of negative press. > > The article in question about journalist Alan Cabal: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article > > Bill > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Charles Matthews<charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> > To: English Wikipedia<wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:23:02 PM > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Forum > > Bill Carter wrote: > >> Can you get Wikipedia Review to take up issue with the speedy deletion on >> March 30th, 2009 of the re-created Alan Cabal article, which was followed by >> a demented deletion review a day later I believe? Here's the article in >> question about journalist Alan Cabal: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article >> >> It looks to me to be a fucking notable article with plenty of citations. >> >> >> > Mosey over there. They'll make you feel right at home. > > Charles > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
