> > In a message dated 4/9/2009 10:21:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > smo...@gmail.com writes: > > "Sanger and most media sources consider Wales and Sanger > co-founders.[cite][cite][cite] Wales disputes it, saying that, > although Sanger played a vital part in the formation of Wikipedia and > his role is regularly underestimated, Wales alone should be considered > the founder.</cite>">> > > > ------------------------- > > Currently the Wikipedia article doesn't seem to mention this controversy > whatsoever, and consistently calls Sanger co-founder. > > Will Johnson
That is good enough. Original research by Jimmy Wales is no better than anyone elses. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
