On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Larry Sanger < > sanger-li...@citizendium.org> wrote: > >> First, whether or not it really is, Wikipedia (like Citizendium and other >> similar projects) ought to be democratic, open, and devoted to free speech >> in a certain sense. The sense is that, as long as a person is generally >> abiding by the rules of the community, he has a right to speak out in >> public >> forums, even if others find it "annoying." If a mob of others are >> outraged >> at what he says, they have the right to try to refute him (under the same >> reasonable rules); but they do not have the right to demand that he be >> silenced. As soon as they gain such authority, the mob is de facto making >> the rules, which is fine for people who love mobs, but absolutely terrible >> for most of humanity and for anybody who cares about justice and other >> things that cannot be made into silly acronyms. > > > Pot meet kettle. > http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk%3AHomeopathy%2FDraft&diff=100448194&oldid=100448185 > And don't forget http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk:Homeopathy/Draft&diff=prev&oldid=100448877 _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
