On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:54 AM, David Cuenca <dacu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A question to Yana et al.: > > Is there any reason for the WMF to promote/sign Zero agreements instead of > the local chapters/user groups? > > I mean, if that ability was subsidized to the chapters we could have a > different strategy depending on the country, because: > - in some places the benefits of promoting Zero outweighs the risks > - in some other places it is just the opposite > > By decoupling the decisions from the umbrella organization we would allow > different strategies according to different needs, with the focus to > converge on net-neutrality on the long term, but not now for everyone, > which is not ideal either. > > Cheers, > Micru > > How would an affiliate have the ability to sign any agreements for the delivery of WMF content? The agreements cover access to WMF-owned websites. I can see local affiliates being helpful with translation, advice and communication support etc., but I don't see that this kind of decision can be decoupled from the WMF. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
