Very, very interesting to get a perspective from the biggest, svwp being
a small project.
You use the word "full member of the community" which I like. I would
say we 45 at svwp could be seen a a fraternity, we know each other
rather well. It will not be possible in the same way if you are 1144,
but probably for the 215 you mention
The fraternity thinking has now for us also been extended into that no
block for more then a few hours (for cooling off) is allowed for sysops
to set on senior editors. Full members of community will only be
blocked longer then a day after a discussion by its peers . So no admin
harassment allowed when you have come into this level of seniority.
(and what the use of blocking these, they come back anyway, under the
same or another nick)
Anders
WereSpielChequers skrev den 2015-03-05 13:59:
On the English language Wikipedia we definitely have a phenomenon that editors
with high edit counts will stay until a major event drives them away.
But the the threshold may not be 38,000 edits, we have 1,444 editor accounts
that have achieved that, and that may no longer be enough to commit you to the
site.
The 14 editors with 500,000 or more edits are all currently active, some are
still among the most active editors on the site. Though the active definition
on [[:en:WP:EDITS]] is merely one or more edits in the last 30 days.
Of the 215 most active editors, 32 are inactive for various reasons and 7 have
anonymised themselves on the list of most active editors (though they may be
active). So 80-85% of our most active editors are still around. Possibly more
when you allow for the fact that at least one of those 32 has closed that
account and now edits from another one.
Sadly our admins have not been so likely to stay with us, only 579 are still
active as admins, though of the 1500 or so former admins quite a few still edit.
Of course the length of tenure for both groups is likely to be unusual. The
vast majority of en wiki admins were appointed more than 7 years ago and it
takes time to accumulate a really high edit count. Though we have fewer editors
with over 100,000 edits than we have active admins, at current rates that will
change in 2016, in recent months we are seeing more editors do their 100,000th
edit than become admins. I suspect one of our problems is that we have fewer
ways for newish editors to feel they have become an established member of the
community. To some extent GLAM, the chapters and the education program do this,
and of course the good and Featured article processes. But we shouldn't be
surprised that fewer people are staying on after their 100th or 1000th edit, as
that is the stage in their wiki career where they are likely to think that they
will never become a full member of the community.
Regards
Jonathan/WereSpielChequers
On 4 Mar 2015, at 19:19, wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikimedia-l mailing list submissions to
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
wikimedia-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wikimedia-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
2. Ciritical level for addiction to Wikipedia (Anders Wennersten)
3. Re: Ciritical level for addiction to Wikipedia (Gerard Meijssen)
5. Re: Ciritical level for addiction to Wikipedia (Ricordisamoa)
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:44:30 +0100
From: Anders Wennersten <m...@anderswennersten.se>
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Ciritical level for addiction to Wikipedia
Message-ID: <54f7366e.6090...@anderswennersten.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On svwp there has over the years been 45 individuals who have each made
more then 38000 edits.
Of these 45, 44 are still active, only one has left (in 2009) making
97,7 still around. For the users with less then 38 000 edits, only about
6 out of 10 is still active.
Is this a global valid number, that when you have made 38000 edits you
are fully addicted to Wikipedia ("until death do us part")?
Anders
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:05:42 +0100
From: Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ciritical level for addiction to Wikipedia
Message-ID:
<CAO53wxX_cbDv7XEMQkV=nWNhr9nk+Y7-f=fj-ovzy2w-k7q...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hoi,
I hope not.. If it were I am a basket case. Hmmm not Wikipedia ... does
Wikidata count ? What number of edits would be sufficient ??
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 March 2015 at 17:44, Anders Wennersten <m...@anderswennersten.se>
wrote:
On svwp there has over the years been 45 individuals who have each made
more then 38000 edits.
Of these 45, 44 are still active, only one has left (in 2009) making 97,7
still around. For the users with less then 38 000 edits, only about 6 out
of 10 is still active.
Is this a global valid number, that when you have made 38000 edits you are
fully addicted to Wikipedia ("until death do us part")?
Anders
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:19:24 +0100
From: Ricordisamoa <ricordisa...@openmailbox.org>
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ciritical level for addiction to Wikipedia
Message-ID: <54f73e9c.2000...@openmailbox.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Il 04/03/2015 17:44, Anders Wennersten ha scritto:
On svwp there has over the years been 45 individuals who have each
made more then 38000 edits.
Of these 45, 44 are still active, only one has left (in 2009) making
97,7 still around. For the users with less then 38 000 edits, only
about 6 out of 10 is still active.
Is this a global valid number, that when you have made 38000 edits you
are fully addicted to Wikipedia ("until death do us part")?
Anders
I've just exceeded 38000 global edits
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Ricordisamoa>. I'm
done for!
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
