That's nice. Do you want me to explicitly say "Volunteers are more important than readers"? Alright. Volunteers (community members, or dismissively, "power users") are way more important than readers. We're the reason there are readers at all. On Dec 2, 2015 9:20 AM, "Andreas Kolbe" <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Todd Allen <toddmal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Also, the banner pops up, comes down, and covers most of the page. That's > > really not acceptable. Wikimedia should follow acceptable ad practices, > > which means a small and STATIC banner, not something that moves, shouts, > or > > otherwise interferes with page content. That should be done even if it > > makes it less effective and raises less money, just to address the > > inevitable butbutbut. > > > > Well, to be fair, the Foundation seems to have done its homework on these > issues with last month's survey.[1] > > When it comes to matters like banner intrusiveness, what matters most is > what the average reader thinks. Volunteers are not necessarily a > representative sample. > > [1] > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/25/Wikimedia_Reader_Survey_November_2015.pdf > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
