Thanks for talking about it Dariusz. Could you please make a serious declaration of interests as is being discussed at [1]. This will help set a ethical model for the rest of the WMF board to follow without needing a year to think about it. If you want to check some best practice examples of meaningful and frank declarations, take a look at WMUK's.[2]
Link 1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_transparency_gap#Conflicts_of_interest_-_investments 2. https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Declarations_of_Interest Thanks, Fae On 10 January 2016 at 14:14, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl> wrote: > 10.01.2016 05:04 "Fæ" <fae...@gmail.com> napisał(a): >> >> To help debunk conspiracy theorists, it would be interesting to find >> out how many of the board of trustees have shares in Google, a useful >> way of finding out who is part of the Googleplex. > > While I don't have, and never had (nor expect to have in the future) any > shares in Google, I have to make a full disclosure that I do use Google for > my internet searches (Google.pl, to be exact, which may also be > occasionally relevant). -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
