On Mar 14, 2016 23:47, "Fæ" <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14 March 2016 at 22:12, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org> wrote: > > On 16-03-14 05:01 PM, Vi to wrote: > >> Ignoring a wide community > >> consensus is *always* a mistake. > > > > It is. I never advocated otherwise. > > > > That old RfC, however, does not show a wide community consensus, let > > alone a consensus of the actually impacted community. > > > > -- Coren / Marc > > You could walk in the shoes of others, as Jimbo advocates, and you > could create an RFC to show whether users prefer it, rather than > putting the burden of proof onto a community that has already > established what it wanted.
Marc just look at the German Wikipedia which recently voted for the switch on of visual editor. It was community driven and caused no stir. I really fail to understand that you guys always go down a confrontational path instead of inventing a solution so all users have the option to choose. Maybe a media tab or similar. Rupert Rupert _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
