Interesting and well-considered perspective, Rob. I appreciate your voice
in this discussion.

Beyond this specific incident, which remains important, I agree, would any
of the three policies proposed address this issue? Is there a policy
amendment that you would like to see?

Thank you for your constructive participation and your clarity,
/a

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Robert Fernandez <wikigamal...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am grateful that the moderators have taken some action, but I am
> disappointed that contacting a person's employer is not yet seen as an
> uncrossable line here.
>
> Out of respect to your call for civility I will refrain from directly
> responding to the person in question despite his allegations against me.
> It is a mistake to frame this as a free speech issue.  It is of course in
> the interests of a person engaging in bullying and harassing behavior to
> claim people are trying to suppress their powerful truths, but there is no
> reason we have to accept this duplicitous framing.  The content of the
> message is immaterial, the behavior is the issue.  Some people may see this
> as a grey area given that it was a Foundation employee, but I see it as a
> slippery slope.  Seddon's job is almost certainly safe, but this might not
> be the case for the next victim.  Will the poster in question decide that I
> am "bullying and harassing" him and attempt to contact my employer next?
>
> Most of my fellow board members of my chapter are the employees of US
> government agencies or connected to the Foundation as an employee or a
> grant recipient.   Given the unusual political climate in the US I worry
> that the former group are particularly vulnerable to harassment targeting
> their employment.   (Media outlets favored by the current US presidential
> administration have targeted individual Wikimedia editors, including
> myself, in the past.)  If participants on this list are allowed to engage
> in this sort of harassment without real consequence, I will advise that my
> chapter and its board members and volunteers no longer participate on this
> list due to the risk to their livelihoods.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Shani Evenstein <shani.e...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Wikimedia-l,
> >
> > Rogol has been placed under moderation, but at this point no decision has
> > been made to ban him from the list. As long as his messages are
> reasonable,
> > respectful and on point, his messages will go through. We agreed that it
> is
> > important to allow a diversity of voices to be heard, including those of
> > "frequent flyers" in the list, especially as we work collaboratively on
> > next steps towards a healthier community atmosphere.
> >
> > In addition, we are asking everyone to refrain from focusing on specific
> > individuals posting to the list, put any personal issues aside and stay
> on
> > problem. We want as many people as possible to productively and
> objectively
> > participate in the discussion, till we draft clearer guidelines for
> posting
> > to the list. We are aware that these guidelines will not automagically
> fix
> > all of our issues as a global community, but we believe they will help
> > reduce the noise substantially. Do keep on debating. We are trying to
> > intervene as little as possible at this point and let the debate run its
> > course.
> >
> > Best,
> > Shani Evenstein, on behalf of the Wikimedia-l Admins.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Why are we having this RFC prior to the survey which was discussed at
> >> length less than a year ago?
> >>
> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:James_Salsman#Peri
> >> odic_survey_prototype
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Robert Fernandez
> >> <wikigamal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Since Rogol has followed through on his threat he should be banned
> from
> >> the
> >> > list, or we should have a public statement from the moderators
> regarding
> >> > why they will not do so.
> >> >
> >> > I can't imagine many actions that would have a more chilling effect on
> >> > participation here than one of this list's most frequent posters
> >> contacting
> >> > your employer because he disagrees with what you have to say.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Joseph Seddon <jsed...@wikimedia.org
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Since you kindly emailed my line manage Rogol, I wanted to confirm
> >> that my
> >> >> choice of words were very carefully chosen.
> >> >>
> >> >> And I stand by them.
> >> >>
> >> >> Seddon
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Rogol Domedonfors <
> >> domedonf...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Joseph
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I chose my wording quite carefully, and suggest that you do so too.
> >> I
> >> >> said
> >> >> > that the proposal "involves", not "is equal to" real-life identity
> >> To
> >> >> the
> >> >> > extent that real-life identities are involved, it is reasonable to
> >> ask
> >> >> how
> >> >> > that personal information is going to be handled.  For some reason,
> >> you
> >> >> > seem keen to derail that part of the discussion by elevating a
> >> quibble
> >> >> over
> >> >> > your hasty misunderstanding of my wording into an accusation,
> which I
> >> >> > reject, of generalised misconduct.  If you have some comment to
> make
> >> >> about
> >> >> > the handling of personal information, please do so.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > May I suggest that you withdraw your original posting, apologise to
> >> the
> >> >> > membership of this list for the unconstructive nature of your
> >> posting,
> >> >> and
> >> >> > to me for its aggressive, insulting and incorrect content.
> >> >> Alternatively,
> >> >> > perhaps you would prefer me to ask your line manager whether this
> is
> >> the
> >> >> > sort of behaviour that she expects you to exhibit in a public
> forum.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Reginald
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Joseph Seddon <
> >> jsed...@wikimedia.org>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > Real identity does not equal real-life identity. You can mask
> your
> >> >> > > pseudonymous identity and pose as a third party similarly
> >> pseudonymous
> >> >> > > individual.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Seddon
> >> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> >> > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> >> > > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> >> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/ma
> >> ilman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> >> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsu
> >> bscribe>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> >> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> >> > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> >> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/ma
> >> ilman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=
> unsubscribe>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Seddon
> >> >>
> >> >> *Advancement Associate (Community Engagement)*
> >> >> *Wikimedia Foundation*
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> >> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> >> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/
> mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik
> >> i/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik
> >> i/Wikimedia-l
> >> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> ,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik
> >> i/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik
> >> i/Wikimedia-l
> >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to