"It also concerns me that the WMF were *not* aware of Community & affiliate
norms in this field - what level of oversight of affiliate governance is
occurring that there being significant affiliates with provisions like this
not be known?"

This is a question I would really like to be answered. For way more than a
decade, the WMF Board maintains a committee precisely to deal with those
issues - first ChapCom, now AffCom. How come this disconnection is
happening between the Board, and their own committee?

P.


<nosebagb...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 25/06/2021 à(s) 18:19:

> Hi Amanda, [Apologies if accidental double-post]
>
> "Moving forward, we will
> articulate and follow the best practices that emerge from these important
> discussions and
> our corresponding review of the attendant policies, procedures, and
> practices."
>
> That would be a reasonable statement if this were a more marginally
> concerning action - something that promoted some concerns, and pointed to
> potential greater future issues if not resolved.
>
> However this indicates the WMF is willing to accept that an error was
> made, but not actually vitiate that error. It also concerns me that the WMF
> were *not* aware of Community & affiliate norms in this field - what level
> of oversight of affiliate governance is occurring that there being
> significant affiliates with provisions like this not be known?
>
> Like functionally the entire participant list of the email thread to date,
> I don't think there was any absence of good faith from key actors. But nor
> do I think it's "merely" (and it's a very big "merely" indeed) an optics
> complaint. There are genuine accidental COI issues that arise, as well as
> the instance raising genuine concerns at the decision-making and awareness
> of community values that anyone operating in such a significant consulting
> role in the most critical field of discussions the movement has had in a
> decade.
>
> Yours,
>
> Nosebagbear
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/YZ6SE42G5U7CTBJQY3CQWNTATCU47G3F/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/3NB5VVN3POFHVKBJ5WADQUERG6UPSS6S/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to