I know I would certainly have appreciated some form of written communication
through the post on becoming a member, just, y'know, to reassure me you guys
knew I existed.

Even a welcome letter with a nice letterhead and a little card wouldn't go
amiss. While you're there, you could preach to your enthusiastic new member
about the sorts of project they could be involving themselves in on behalf
of WMUK. This might add a few more man-hours to the project.

Incidentally, I should add that I have no particular view on dropping the
membership price. All I can tell you is that I paid the discounted rate of
£6 and thought nothing of it.

Jarry1250
On 25 February 2010 12:51, Bod Notbod <bodnot...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:52 PM, James Hardy <wikimedi...@weeb.biz> wrote:
>
> > I can not
> > really imagine any tangible benefits that WMUK can provide. After all,
> our
> > purpose is to make knowledge free, it would seem counter-intuitive to
> close
> > anything off to be members-only.
>
> One that occurs to me is that perhaps WMUK could negotiate with GLAMs
> that WMUK members get a preferential rate to enter exhibitions and the
> like.
>
> However, I think that would have to be some way off in the future, I
> don't get the impression that WMUK is big enough or has the spare man
> hours to try and get that off the ground at the moment. But maybe one
> day...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to