That's excellent - do you think we could use our own-branded derivative as it's CC-BY-SA 3.0?
I've attached a tiny thumbnail of what it might look like. -- Doug On 3 August 2012 17:10, Michael Peel <michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > > On 3 Aug 2012, at 09:06, Gordon Joly wrote: > > > On 03/08/12 15:46, Michael Peel wrote: > >> > >> 'We' the editing community (all >1000 that !voted online) felt > SOPA/PIPA was relevant, and blacked out the site. 'We' the charity > communicated the decision and views of the community to the media. It's > very much this communication role that we the charity can easily play here. > > > > > > But will the public always be clear about the distinction between "EN > Wikipedia" and "Wikimedia UK"? > > > > Are they now? > > Maybe we should start regularly pointing them towards this illustration to > make it all clear: > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WMNL_-_NRC_CHARITY_AWARD.jpg > > Thanks, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
<<attachment: How it gets there - uk - 240.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
