On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's what the IWF's been consistently asserting to the press, that's > > what their rep said on Radio 4 Today when I was on and that's what > > many journalists have said to me that the IWF said to them. Given > > this, I feel confident in stating that the IWF really believe that > > they are required to block the page the image is on. > > Do they believe it is a technical limitation (it's not, if they think > this we need to educate them harder) or that its their purpose? I'm sure the organization consists of people with a whole spectrum of technical knowledge. Why doesn't Wikipedia provide a page without the image on it, so that it doesn't get blocked? A little too hard-headed, maybe? _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
