Le 11/11/2016 à 08:32, Sam Wilson a écrit :
That sounds really interesting! Do you mean as a way for people
unfamiliar with Wikisource to easily contribute notes and corrections?
On the face of things, it could perhaps work by storing the notes in a
the Page_talk namspace and doing some clever thing to display them on
the Page (and perhaps in main) namespaces.
Sounds a good initial implementation path. Users may also would like to
make more "personal" text comments, in which case storing them in User
namespace might be more appropriate.
It seems like it'd be cool to be able to get "typo reports" or
something, from people who mightn't have any idea of Wikisource other
than that's where they got an epub.
To rate a page, we currently have the various levels of proofreading
quality. Is this not sufficient?
Well, at least I would appreciate something more modular. Thinking about
it, I may just use some categories, and maybe some js or lua to generate
what I wish.
And does the current Index page overview of all of a book's statuses
work for you?
That's the same. The thing is, I do like to make restitution as accurate
to the original page as I can. That's a work which might be done in
several parallel step. For example page layout, proofreading, and image
extractions might be in different state of completeness. And for example
I do like to have a really accurate page reproduction, so even caesura
is the same in Page namespace, but still render without unnecessary
dashes in main namespace (example
<https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Holbach_-_Le_Christianisme_d%C3%A9voil%C3%A9,_1756.djvu/46>).
But not all contributors have this will. :)
I sometimes wonder if we need another rating, above 'validated', that
indicates that a whole book has been read through and (hopefully) any
remaining typos have been found.
My feedback doesn't really suggest a "rating above", but having
separated rates/tags.
—sam
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, at 12:27 AM, mathieu stumpf guntz wrote:
Hmm, at the conference I think someone was interested in a feature to
make comments on texts, like you can make on some word processors for
example. That may be interesting, but how you render the result might
be a huge user interface problem. One should be able to choose whom
comments should be visible…
Otherwise, I would still be happy to have more flexibable way to
"rate" a page. That is, a page might be text proof readed, but laking
some css, or a picture should be extracted etc. Having a way to see
that for all pages in the book: namespace would be fine.
ĝis baldaŭ
Le 10/11/2016 à 06:09, Sam Wilson a écrit :
Thanks Alex :) It's a minor project so far, but I reckon the work you've
been doing on making a better, bigger, more proofreading-focused
interface is really good. Do stick a proposal up!
So far, we've got:
* Add a 'clean' method for side-titles, and side notes to parser
* A spelling- and typo-checking system for proofreading
* Visual Editor menu refresh
* upload text wizard
* Language links in Wikisource for edition items in Wikidata
* Display subpage name in category
* Make Special:IndexPage transcludeable
* Fix Extension:Cite to get rid of foibles
If anyone's got half-formed ideas, I'd encourage you to post something,
or just post to this mailing list, and we can all have a chat about it.
:)
—sam
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016, at 04:50 PM, Alex Brollo wrote:
I too could add *some* proposals.... but the first one could be a deep revision of nsPage
edit interface to got the goal "fixed tools, almost full screen scrolling text &
image". In the meantime, I'm go on testing FullScreenEditing.js by Sam, that presently
is an excellent, running step approximating such a goal.
Alex
2016-11-09 1:03 GMT+01:00 Sam Wilson<s...@samwilson.id.au>
<mailto:s...@samwilson.id.au>:
__
Huzza for Wikisource; we've currently got more proposals than any of the other
categories (not that it's a competition, but still...).
@Micru: this whole topic of how to represent bibliographic data in WD and
properly link it in Wikisource is great! I'm looking forward to helping. :-)
—sam
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, at 10:08 PM, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:
Hi Thomas,
thanks for bringing that up! I wrote a proposal to finish the work retrieving
the language links from several editions and represent them in wikisource as
language links.
To write or vote exiting Wikisource proposals, the link is:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Categories/Wikisource
Cheers,
Micru
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas PT<thoma...@hotmail.fr>
<mailto:thoma...@hotmail.fr> wrote:
Hello everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team has launched a new "Community Wishlist
Survey".
Last year survey allowed us to get WMF staff time to work on using Google OCR
in Wikisource that allowed some Indian languages Wikisources to raise and on
VisualEditor support.
Please, take time to submit new wishes and comment them. It could be simple
things (e.g. a new gadget for a specific workflow) or very complicated ones
(e.g. native TEI support).
Cheers,
Thomas
Début du message réexpédié :
*De: *Johan Jönsson<jjons...@wikimedia.org> <mailto:jjons...@wikimedia.org>
*Objet: **[Wikitech-ambassadors] Your help needed: Community Wishlist Survey
2016*
*Date: *7 novembre 2016 à 20:26:21 UTC+1
*À: *Wikitech Ambassadors<wikitech-ambassad...@lists.wikimedia.org>
<mailto:wikitech-ambassad...@lists.wikimedia.org>
*Répondre à: *Coordination of technology deployments across languages/projects<wikitech-ambassad...@lists.wikimedia.org>
<mailto:wikitech-ambassad...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi everyone,
Last year, the Community Tech team did a survey for a community wishlist to
decide what we shoudl be working on throughout the year. Since it's useful to
have a list of tasks from the Wikimedia communities, it's also been used by
other developers,
been the focus of Wikimedia hackathons and so on. In short, I think it
matters.
Now we're doing the process again.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Community_Wishlist_Survey
If you'd feel like spreading this in your communities, it would be much
appreciated.
*) This is when you can suggest things. This phase will last from 7 November to
20 November.
*) Editors who are not comfortable writing in English can write proposals in
their language.
*) Voting will take place 28 November to 12 December.
Thanks,
//Johan Jönsson
--
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
wikitech-ambassad...@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:wikitech-ambassad...@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
--
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
_________________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_________________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_________________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l