On 07/01/11 07:50, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Alex Brollo <alex.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Browsing the html code of source pages, I found this statement into a html >> comment: >> >> *Expensive parser function count: 0/500* >> >> I'd like to use this statement to evaluate "lightness" of a page, mainly >> testing the expensiveness of templates into the page but: in your opinion, >> given that the best would be a 0/500 value, what are limits for a good, >> moderately complex, complex page, just to have a try to work about? What is >> a really alarming value that needs fast fixing? > > A really alarming value that needs fast fixing would be, approximately > speaking, 501 or higher. That's why the maximum is there. We don't > leave fixing this kind of thing to users.
I think the maximum was set to 100 initially, and raised to 500 due to user complaints. I'd be completely happy if users fixed all the templates that caused pages to use more than 100, then we could put the limit back down. -- Tim _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
