2011/1/11 Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> > On 07/01/11 07:50, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Alex Brollo <alex.bro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Browsing the html code of source pages, I found this statement into a > html > >> comment: > >> > >> *Expensive parser function count: 0/500* > > I think the maximum was set to 100 initially, and raised to 500 due to > user complaints. I'd be completely happy if users fixed all the > templates that caused pages to use more than 100, then we could put > the limit back down. >
Thanks Tim. So, implementing a simple js to show that value (and the other three data too) in small characters and into a border of the page into the page display is not completely fuzzy. As I told I hate to waste resources - any kind of them. It's a pity that those data are not saved into the xml dump. But I don't want to overload the servers just to get data about servers overloading. :-) Just another question about resources. I can get the same result with an AJAX call or with a #lst (labeled section transclusion) call. Which one is lighter for servers in your opinion? Or - are they they more or less similar? Alex _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l