On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:39, Krinkle <krinklem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Op 8 apr 2011, om 01:11 heeft MZMcBride het volgende geschreven:
> > I mostly agree with you, I think, but you seem to be side-stepping the
> > linking issue. The fact that it's currently quite ugly to make an
> > edit link
> > or a protect link is one of the biggest arguments in favor of using
> > Special
> > pages.
> >
> > Assuming all actions were standardized to use the ?action=
> > parameter, what
> > do you think about an {{#action:}} parser function? It would allow for
> > something like [[{{#action:move|Main Page}}]]. Does this seem
> > reasonable? If
> > so, I think a page on MediaWiki with some transition information and
> > a more
> > in-depth look at what's actually needed to get to a consistent state
> > would
> > be a good next step (assuming such a page doesn't exist already).
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > MZMcBride
>
> Indeed, the linking issue is one of the things action-parameters does
> not fix.
> But like you say, those could be solved in another way.
>
> I like the {{#action}} idea. I'm not sure [[ and ]] can or should
> still be needed though.
>
> --
> Krinkle

This reminds me of Bug 14892 (Allow external links in edit summary and
log reason):
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14892

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to