2011/6/8 Ildefons Stułbia <ildefons.stul...@gmail.com>: > 2011/6/7 Leo Koppelkamm <diebu...@gmail.com>: >> There's usually some code (general utility fn's, some legacy remappings >> etc.) in common.js that could break a lot of stuff if missing. +1 on moving >> optional stuff to gadgets > > It depends on project. General utility functions should be available > as modules, which can be loaded when there is such need (as a > dependency to a gadget or by user/script explicitly). It makes easier > to port gadget to other projects and maintain them, when its > dependencies are well defined, so all changes can be easily tracked. > Separate modules can be directly imported, which is impossible with > overbloated MediaWiki:Common.js. >
Yes, it does depend on the project, but I'm pretty sure that in most projects there are some chunks of js in Common.js that simply should not be disabled. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
