On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, John Elliot <j...@jj5.net> wrote: > On 10/08/2011 8:47 AM, Chad wrote: >> I guess that's only embarrassing if those sorts of things bother you. > > I think it would be fair to have it both ways. There are a class of > people who are bothered by things of that sort. I'm sure I'm not alone, > at least on this issue. :P > >> I'm with Dan on this one, I've never thought those validator buttons >> are very nice additions to a website. Remind me a little too much of >> the "Optimized for NN4" buttons of old. > > I think there's a pretty big difference between providing a feature > whereby a user can validate the HTML they've just authored and > proclaiming browser patronage. >
Most of our users won't know or care whether their pages validate. Those that do presumably know how to use a validator already. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
