I don't know if this is a part of some joke https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0/status
but it seems that someone wrote some code 2012/4/5 Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com>: > This isn't true? > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0 > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Ariel T. Glenn <ar...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> *cough* LQT 3 is private because it doesn't exist... see the date of >> that email (hint, 1st day of April). >> >> If there were to be a project like that I expect it would be very very >> public indeed. ;-) >> >> Ariel >> >> Στις 05-04-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:10 +0200, ο/η Petr Bena έγραψε: >>> When we talk about the public code, why the development of new >>> software like LQT 3 is private? Why community devs can't participate >>> on that? When is it going to be pushed to readeable repository? I also >>> heard from B Harris that there is a work on new interface design, >>> which some code name, there is no code for it, why? >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> >>> wrote: >>> > On 04/04/12 22:58, Petr Bena wrote: >>> >> It should be clearly mentioned somewhere on guidelines for developers >>> >> that attempts to create software which is supposed to be deployed to >>> >> foundation sites will be likely overlooked. >>> > >>> > We don't want to document it when we don't want it to be the case. >>> > Documenting it would give the impression that it is an acceptable >>> > situation. >>> > >>> > Anyway, it certainly isn't the case for core contributions, or for >>> > contributions to existing extensions, both of which have a healthy >>> > level of community commits. The problem is limited to new extension >>> > deployments, and perhaps to major core branch merges like IWTransclusion. >>> > >>> > We're not behaving like Oracle does with Java or MySQL, or like Google >>> > does with Android. We develop code in public repositories and grant >>> > commit access liberally. >>> > >>> > You're setting a high standard with your demands, but it happens to be >>> > a standard we want to meet. So please, keep nagging and watch this space. >>> > >>> > -- Tim Starling >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Wikitech-l mailing list >>> > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikitech-l mailing list >>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
