The mediawiki page is legit, although you'll notice that it's not been updated since last October; this reflects the fact that there's not current work going on. The email announcement to this list was not.
Ariel Στις 05-04-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:47 +0200, ο/η Petr Bena έγραψε: > I don't know if this is a part of some joke > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0/status > > but it seems that someone wrote some code > > 2012/4/5 Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com>: > > This isn't true? > > > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0 > > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Ariel T. Glenn <ar...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> *cough* LQT 3 is private because it doesn't exist... see the date of > >> that email (hint, 1st day of April). > >> > >> If there were to be a project like that I expect it would be very very > >> public indeed. ;-) > >> > >> Ariel > >> > >> Στις 05-04-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:10 +0200, ο/η Petr Bena έγραψε: > >>> When we talk about the public code, why the development of new > >>> software like LQT 3 is private? Why community devs can't participate > >>> on that? When is it going to be pushed to readeable repository? I also > >>> heard from B Harris that there is a work on new interface design, > >>> which some code name, there is no code for it, why? > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > On 04/04/12 22:58, Petr Bena wrote: > >>> >> It should be clearly mentioned somewhere on guidelines for developers > >>> >> that attempts to create software which is supposed to be deployed to > >>> >> foundation sites will be likely overlooked. > >>> > > >>> > We don't want to document it when we don't want it to be the case. > >>> > Documenting it would give the impression that it is an acceptable > >>> > situation. > >>> > > >>> > Anyway, it certainly isn't the case for core contributions, or for > >>> > contributions to existing extensions, both of which have a healthy > >>> > level of community commits. The problem is limited to new extension > >>> > deployments, and perhaps to major core branch merges like > >>> > IWTransclusion. > >>> > > >>> > We're not behaving like Oracle does with Java or MySQL, or like Google > >>> > does with Android. We develop code in public repositories and grant > >>> > commit access liberally. > >>> > > >>> > You're setting a high standard with your demands, but it happens to be > >>> > a standard we want to meet. So please, keep nagging and watch this > >>> > space. > >>> > > >>> > -- Tim Starling > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Wikitech-l mailing list > >>> > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Wikitech-l mailing list > >>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikitech-l mailing list > >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
