On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:48 PM, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > I think we should take a holistic approach to the Bugzilla workflow. I was > hoping the incoming Wikimedia Foundation entomologist would work on this. > It'd be great to fix one aspect of bug filing (such as the use of keywords), > but it'd be even better to take a look at the entire workflow and figure out > ways to make it suck less. > > For example, the high-level categorizations are pretty awful currently. What > is and is not a product is inconsistent and confusing. I started some notes > about this at > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Bugzilla_taxonomy>. > > Perhaps that page could/should be re-titled to "Bugzilla workflow" and we > could address a few outstanding Bugzilla workflow problems at once?
Yup, I would like that. The workflow does need work, as well as other aspects. I wouldn't want this to become such a major project that it never gets done, but I think there's value in a holistic look at things. Rob _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
