On 2013-10-01 3:46 PM, "Ryan Lane" <rlan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Tyler Romeo <tylerro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Has anybody ever considered the possibility that maybe people don't know
> > (or want to know) how to set up a caching proxy? One of the nice things
> > about MediaWiki is that it's extraordinarily easy to set up. All you
have
> > to do is dump a tar.gz file into a directory, run the web installer and
> > call it a day. No sysadmin experience required.
> >
> >
> This is only true if you want almost no functionality of out MediaWiki and
> you want it to be very slow. MediaWiki is incredibly difficult to properly
> run and requires at least some minor sysadmin experience to do so. There's
> a reason that almost every MediaWiki install in existence is completely
out
> of date.
>
> When we get to Wordpress's ease of use, then we can assume this.
>
> - Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

I disagree. For a low traffic site, its probably performant enough with
just APC caching, which the installer sets up for you. Vanilla mediawiki
does the things you expect a wiki to do. I doubt these types of users
want/need complex things like abuse filter and lua. (Unless you are copying
templates from wikipedia)

The major thing out of the box mw is missing is confirm edit. The other
stuff is cool but non-essential imo.

-bawolff
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to