On 1 October 2013 20:01, Brian Wolff <bawo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I disagree. For a low traffic site, its probably performant enough with > just APC caching, which the installer sets up for you. Vanilla mediawiki > does the things you expect a wiki to do. I doubt these types of users > want/need complex things like abuse filter and lua. (Unless you are copying > templates from wikipedia) > The major thing out of the box mw is missing is confirm edit. The other > stuff is cool but non-essential imo.
For my use on intranets, the thing I'm desperate for is a usable visual editor. (Testing and reporting bugs on VE as fast as I can ...) - d. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
