On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:27 AM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 June 2014 19:17, Brian Wolff <bawo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Personally I have yet to see a discussion system that surpasses (or > > really even comes close) to standard talk page ":::comment here. ~~~~" > > syntax. Honestly it would make me happy if we just used that in > > general. > > The exception being pages with large influxes of newbies, like > > Project:Support_desk. In those pages LQT really does make a difference > > to ensure things are well organized. > > > YMMV. Wikipedia is pretty much enculturated, but RationalWiki gets > n00bs *all the time* who object to something on a page. You know what > the most frequent reply involves? "Please learn to sign your > comments." > If auto signatures are the best thing LQT/Flow brings, I have a bad feeling about it. --Martijn > > Talk pages really aren't a great communication mechanism for non-geeks. > > (RW also suffers under a LQT installation that I desperately want to > kill and would be most pleased to replace with Flow. I'm going to take > us from 1.19 to 1.23 when that's out and stable. Possibly with the VE > faff. Will Flow be able to be bolted onto an existing 1.23?) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
