On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:58:00 -0500, you wrote:

Talking about SPAM.....

I was using McAfee Spamkiller until 3 days ago.  I inadvertently told it to
send a 550 to some "gold" spammer and other crap.

Within 3 days I had back 1356 Returned Posting messages saying the address
is not available.  I then set a catch all filter at my ISP and it stopped
all spam and some legit mail that I couldn't afford to kill so I
deactivated the filter.  today I got 2 no available returns and 4 real
spams

Oh!  I forgot to mention I also uninstalled McAfee Spankiller 2 days ago.
Total RUBBISH (trash) as far as Spamkillers go.

Any other suggestion on a spam filter to use with Agent?

Hugh

>On 8 Dec 2005 at 14:52, KMF-MIS wrote:
>
>> At 10:30 PM -0700 12/2/2005, Ben Parker wrote:
>> >On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:29:24 -0500, KMF-MIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>It might also help (at least the subscribers) if the list bounce processor 
>> >>was a little smarter. The reason currently given in the e-mail for 
>> >>unsubbing a subscriber when spam cop is in play is incorrect, if the 
>> >>bounce processor looked at the enhanced status code (RFC 1893) in the 
>> >>bounce message and unsubbed 5.1.1 but not 5.7.1 this would allow time for 
>> >>the least to get off spam cop or for the subscriber to white list the 
>> >>particular mail server being listed.
>> >
>> >This won't help.  Looking at the mail server logs shows that most of the
>> >affected users are getting auto-deleted from the list because the receiving
>> >site returns a 550 (no such user) error code during the SMTP transaction/
>> >delivery attempt.  SMTP error codes are intended to be 'definitive' and
>> >LISTSERV does not attempt to 'second-guess' them.
>> 
>> RFC 821 seems to indicate that a 550 doesn't mean "no such user", it means
>> 
>> " 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
>>             [E.g., mailbox not found, no access]"
>
>Not to quibble, but the current RFC in force is 2821, and it says:
>
>>     ... If the recipient
>>    is known not to be a deliverable address, the SMTP server returns a 550
>>    reply, typically with a string such as "no such user - " and the
>>    mailbox name (other circumstances and reply codes are possible).
>
>The current spec for 550 is:
>
>>       550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
>>          (e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected
>>          for policy reasons)
>
>  /Bernie\
>-- 
>Bernie Cosell                     Fantasy Farm Fibers
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]     Pearisburg, VA
>    -->  Too many people, too few sheep  <--       

--
                ----------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is your picture included in the Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page?
 http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html
If not, write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to