On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 10:17 -0400, Tom Wickline wrote: > On 3/25/07, H. Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 25/03/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So which of the following things do we want for 1.0? > > While nice to have, I don't think d3d10 or some of the more advanced > > SM 3.0 features should block 1.0. You already know my opinion on > > broken drivers. > > > > Things that aren't there, but IMO should be: > > - Make GLSL default > > Well from my test GLSL is just about on par with ARB's performance at this > time. > > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.33 > and > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.6 > > I still need to run PCMark04 and file a bug report and 0.9.33 will be > complete. > > I am aware there are a couple remaining task that need completed > before GLSL is set as default, just thought I would share the > performance state at this time. > > Tom
Does anyone here know if the NVIDIA Windows drivers are still rigged with regards to the various 3DMark suite of benchmarks? There was a scandal a while back, and the company claimed to pull their special hacks out, but then they were caught again later doing the same thing. It'd be a shame if we were testing rigged Windows drivers vs unrigged Linux ones. Thanks, Scott Ritchie