On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about checking for a string in the email like "patchwatchignore"; > if for some reason the patch is known to cause a failure the e-mail > might read like: > patchwatchignore > This depends on Harald's patch from yesterday... > [patch]
If patchwatcher becomes a gatekeeper, we will add a bypass like that. > This also might be useful for patches which update comments or README > files, etc. It's a lot easier to let the hardware run the tests, and as long as the hardware is fast enough to not get backlogged, the payoff for using the bypass for doc-only changes is small.
