On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: >> With those changes, I now see 457 non-leak errors, >> (~134 of which are due to the fresh regression >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20920 ) >> and 1560 leak errors >> (~300 of which are due to ntlm_auth, which I'm still >> trying to suppress), in the wine conformance test suite. > > I had a build problem (script error) that made test results > from Monday through this morning funny. I reran after > fixing the error; results at > http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-12-09-17.02/ > > I now count 289 non-leak errors and 981 leak errors. > Some of the remaining reported errors in msi are probably my > fault - I'm running them in parallel. Probably making > them all use different data files would do the trick... > - Dan >
I was wondering why you were getting so many msi test failures and errors! Now I know. Yes, the msi tests can't be run in parallel, even on windows. Vincent stated that he thinks the StorageImpl_Construct bug is fixed, yet I'm still seeing the errors. Vincent, can you take a look at the results? Thanks, James Hawkins