On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:51 PM, James Hawkins <trui...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was wondering why you were getting so many msi test failures and >> errors! Now I know. Yes, the msi tests can't be run in parallel, >> even on windows. > > What if I use a different msi database for each test? That'd be easy. >
Yea, an easy fix would be to change the msifile constant by appending the name of the test or something. That should give a different package for each test. A more proper fix would be to have the database/package generator function create a temp filename for the package and give that back to you, but it hardly seems worth the effort. > Otherwise I'll take them out of my whitelist. > >> Vincent stated that he thinks the >> StorageImpl_Construct bug is fixed, yet I'm still seeing the errors. >> Vincent, can you take a look at the results? > > Yes, that seems ok now, thanks. > - Dan >