Nikolay Sivov <nsivov <at> codeweavers.com> writes:
> > > I believe developer's attention doesn't depend on bug state > (confirmed/uncofirmed) at all. I'm not sure about that, my experience is that some developers do care about regressions and some don't (actually i think that they missed the bug reports where the regressions are reported) . It would help at least that if those who don't, drop a little message that they saw the bugreport and are aware of the regression they caused ( or if their patch just was correct, and just revealed another wine-bug, add that information) > Actually a "regression" keyword supposes to mean exactly the same. I don't agree about that, "regression" means the app doesn't work anymore, that could also be because of a distro-upgrade or a mis-configured system at the user side. Bisected means someone with same system+distro has pinpointed the exact patch that caused trouble. So this should have top-priority for wine-devs to look at, if wine wants to get mature.
