On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 23-05-10 01:57, Dan Kegel wrote: >> >> I think it's a good idea. 'regression' isn't as strong as 'bisected'. >> >> Unless there are objections, I'll add the keyword on Monday. >> > > I think I'll object. I don't see any point in the bisected tag that > regression doesn't already cover. As far as I know as soon as you tag > something as regression you either already have bisected it, or will be > asked to bisect it quickly after adding the regression tag. > > Cheers, > Maarten >
You know what would be neat? Turn fixing Wine into a game. Give people points for successfully reporting bugs, take points away for reporting duplicates, give more points for successfully bisecting a bug... Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu