2013/6/25 Henri Verbeet <hverb...@gmail.com> > On 24 June 2013 16:44, Matteo Bruni <matteo.myst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @@ -1673,6 +1673,8 @@ struct texture_stage_op > > unsigned aarg2 : 8; > > unsigned aarg0 : 8; > > > > + DWORD constant; > > + > > struct color_fixup_desc color_fixup; > > unsigned tex_type : 3; > > unsigned dst : 1; > > > > You don't need this if you use uniforms. > > Also adding a test would be nice probably. > > > Yeah, that's the main issue. We don't want a shader for every possible > set of per-stage constant values. The one you missed is that if we > implement this, we should also set the appropriate caps bit. >
Spin Tires does not seem to check this caps. That's why I missed it first. > > The most obvious issue is of course the subject line. Sure, typos > happen, but it's just plain sloppy. It's a typo yes. You can easy deduced this with the patch description. > At least try to pretend you put > some effort into making sure the patch is as good as it can be before > submitting it. > I could have send the patch to wine-devel first but would I get something longer that "several issues" as feedback? I can certainly improve my patches and you can certainly improve your way of giving feedback but that would be great if you could avoid this kind of commentary. This is not usefull. At least for me. For technical stuff you can be as verbose as you want. I'm full open.
