What if you already have a bunch of 1200's and expect only to supplement in the years to come, what is a good solution?
Martin D. Flagg Network Engineer/Administrator Hiram College -----Original Message----- From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:42 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Self-Healing- does it work? Yep- know all about it, but don't have the luxury of such a migration at this point. It's logical to think about going there in the future, but for now, am curious about the WLSE-enabled self-healing. Lee >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/6/2005 11:23:29 AM >>> > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:55 AM > > I am contemplating piloting a rather large new building to use Cisco's > WLSE/AP "self healing" features- have had some success with it in > small test areas. Wondering if anyone is using it on a larger scale > and has either gotten comfortable with it or has experienced pain as a > result. > Lee, Have you looked at Cisco's WISP with the WCS software instead of the WLSE. (Jeeze does Cisco love those W acronyms) Translation, Instead of using the 1200 intelligent AP with the WLSE engine, using the cheaper "Thin" AP's with the intelligence in the core. Otherwise known as the Airespace product line. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
