Also beware- we had to put many of our switches/Fat APs both set to 100
Mb/Full Duplex to avoid mismatches. Unfortunately, the LWAPPs almost
demand auto/auto. I find that most of them that attach to switch ports
that are nailed to 100/Full will come up at 100/half duplex on the AP.
Unfortunately, the APs can not give you this information (like the Fat
APs could)- nor does WCS as it lacks any switch visibility (like the
WLSE had)- so you have to really watch the switch ports for issues.
Which means you have to keep careful track of the switchports...

Regards-

Lee 

Lee Badman
Network/Wireless Engineer
Syracuse University
315 443-3003

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/15/2007 2:11 PM >>>
I was wondering if anyone out there has upgraded their Cisco 1200 APs
to 
the code that is supposed to do LWAPP?  I have looked at the 
documentation that Cisco provide.  But I did not find anything about
the 
setup.  Does it work at layer 3 or layer 2?  Do you still let the APs 
that IP address of the controllers through option 43 or is there some 
other mechanism?  Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thanks

Jorge Bodden



--------------------

This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
contents of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this message in error or are not the named recipient, please notify us
immediately by contacting the sender at the electronic mail address
noted above, and delete and destroy all copies of this message.  Thank
you.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to