Thanks Neil.  I though this part was particularly insightful:


Wi-Fi access protocol changes will require physically changing door locks.

Network Services continually optimizes the Wi-Fi network to best support our 
ever-changing students’ needs. Network Services no longer supports the 
802.11b wireless protocol. It is expected that in the next 5 years we will 
drop support for 802.11a/g, and it is possible we will drop support for 2.4 
GHz entirely within 10 years. This means that the access control system will 
need to be upgraded to follow the rapid pace of Wi-Fi technology. These 
upgrades should be factored into the long-term costs of the system.

I pretty much assumed we’d have to support outdated wireless hardware and 
protocols in order to accommodate building systems with a 10 to 15 year 
upgrade cycle.  I like this approach better.  I wonder if we can sell it.



Chuck Enfield

Manager, Wireless Systems & Engineering

Telecommunications & Networking Services

The Pennsylvania State University

110H, USB2, UP, PA 16802

ph: 814.863.8715

fx: 814.865.3988





From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Johnson, Neil M
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 2:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Door Locks





Our housing folks are also looking into replacing keyed locks with wireless 
door locks in all of our dorms. They’ve put off a pilot for the fall in 
order to gather more information.



Below are excerpts from a document we sent to all the parties involved with 
our concerns:



While this should not be considered exhaustive list, here are the issues we 
have identified with using a Wi-Fi infrastructure for access control.



Wi-Fi is susceptible to several sources of interference.
While Network Services will do its best to provide a robust and reliable 
wireless service, there are many issues outside of Network Services’ control 
that could negatively affect the access control system. Wi-Fi uses 
unlicensed spectrum and can be subject to interference from other devices 
(Cordless phones, Microwaves, wireless printers, student-deployed access 
points, and wireless cameras are just a few examples).



Wi-Fi access protocol changes will require physically changing door locks.

Network Services continually optimizes the Wi-Fi network to best support our 
ever-changing students’ needs. Network Services no longer supports the 
802.11b wireless protocol. It is expected that in the next 5 years we will 
drop support for 802.11a/g, and it is possible we will drop support for 2.4 
GHz entirely within 10 years. This means that the access control system will 
need to be upgraded to follow the rapid pace of Wi-Fi technology. These 
upgrades should be factored into the long-term costs of the system.



Maintaining the security of the Wi-Fi infrastructure for access control 
devices requires additional resources:
While we are not familiar with the specific security mechanisms used by the 
Wi-Fi based access control system, we speculate the security of the Wi-Fi 
connection to access control devices will either be based on Pre-shared Keys 
or TLS Certificates. Pre-shared keys would need to be changed on a periodic 
basis to maintain adequate security of the system and even TLS certificates 
would also need to be updated regularly. This would most likely require that 
each access control device be “touched” on a regular basis (1 to 3 years). 
Network Services would not be responsible for updating individual access 
control devices. That would be the responsibility of Housing or Facilities. 
These updates need to be factored into the long-term costs of the system.



Supporting wireless access control devices would require that Network 
Services recover certain extra costs:
It is likely that Network Services will have to create, maintain, and 
support a dedicated custom wireless service for the access control system. 
This includes staff resources to maintain the pre-shared keys, TLS 
Certificates, or MAC address databases of the access control devices. 
Network Services would have to commit additional resources to monitor the 
availability and security of the Wi-Fi system. These costs would need to be 
recovered and should be factored into the cost of the system.

Off hours support for troubleshooting Wi-Fi related issues is limited:
Network Services does not currently have the staff resources to provide 24X7 
support for the Wi-Fi service.  While we do respond promptly after hours to 
issues involving the loss of service in an entire building or buildings, we 
are not staffed to respond after hours to isolated problems (such as an 
individual student not being able access their room).

Running parallel Wi-Fi systems is not possible.It has been suggested that 
Housing might install their own parallel Wi-Fi service to support the access 
control system. Due to the shared nature of Wi-Fi spectrum it would be 
disruptive to both services to try to run them in parallel. It would cause 
disruption to the University’s service for students. This would also violate 
University of Iowa policy.

The product is not tested to run in our environment
To truly evaluate the feasibility of any system requires that devices and 
systems be tested on-site.  Network Services has found out (often the hard 
way) that relying on vendor specifications and experiences of other 
institutions does not replace physical on-site testing of new technologies 
and systems. It is the only way to find out the true limitations of the 
technologies and products proposed for use.

-- 

Neil Johnson

Network Engineer

The University of Iowa

Phone: 319 384-0938

Fax: 319 335-2951

E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edu <mailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu>







On Jul 6, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Lee H Badman <lhbad...@syr.edu 
<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu> > wrote:



Doing 2.4 GHz 11n currently, will 11ac expected “sometime”- sorry for typo.



-Lee

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W 
(Network Services)
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 7:48 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Door Locks



Lee,



You have Assa Abloy locks doing 5GHz? What models? Ours are 2.4 only.



BTWE, I assume you meant 11ac, not 11c hence my question.







Bruce Osborne

Wireless Engineer

IT Infrastructure & Media Solutions



(434) 592-4229



LIBERTY UNIVERSITY

Training Champions for Christ since 1971



From: Lee H Badman [ <mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu> mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu]
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Wireless Door Locks



We are doing wireless door locks on internal classroom doors (no external 
doors) with little fanfare so far (almost two years, slow rollout in a few 
buildings thus far). ASSA ABLOY locks, 802.11n with 11c expected (sometime) 
and 802.1X.  I’m not thrilled, and laid out the risks clearly, yet still 
here we are. But they are working fine.



-Lee



Lee Badman

Wireless/Network Architect

ITS, Syracuse University

315.443.3003

(Blog:  <http://wirednot.wordpress.com/> http://wirednot.wordpress.com)



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ 
<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> 
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Derek Johnson
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:33 PM
To:  <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Door Locks



Our campus planners are looking to standardize & modernize lock systems 
across campus, and they're drooling over my worst nightmare wireless door 
locks that connect to our existing wifi network.  2.4GHz only, of course. 
I'm against this idea for too many reasons to list (technical & 
security-based), but I'm curious to hear perspectives from the community. 
Has anyone deployed or had to support a wifi-based door lock system?  What's 
been your experience?

On the flip side, have you successfully fended off a push for wireless door 
locks?  If so, do tell... :)

Thinking back to Lee's recent drone discussion... perhaps I can get 
administration interested in drone surveillance instead of wifi door locks. 
That's an idea I could get behind...


Derek Johnson | Data Communications Coordinator
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY
415 Lyman Dr. TH 101, Hays, KS 67601
(785) 628 - 5688 |  <mailto:dpjohn...@fhsu.edu> dpjohn...@fhsu.edu

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
<http://www.educause.edu/groups/> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
<http://www.educause.edu/groups/> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to