It's a good point, and there was a bit of chatter on this on Twitter. The FCC has left the whole thing way too open-ended given the popularity of Wi-Fi, and a lot of topics bleed over on to each other.
I'd be surprised if they responded in any way- the preference seems to be to ambush users with fines. Lee H. Badman Network Architect/Wireless TME ITS, Syracuse University 315.443.3003 ________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Philippe Hanset <phan...@anyroam.net> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 10:34 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 6-month follow-up to Marriott/FCC Wifi blocking stories Lee, I just read your Open Letter. Good work. Thank you. One question that I have for future reference is: “What constitutes blocking?” You mention White Noise or Frame manipulation… What if building owners have frequency blocking material as part of the design of the building. This could be considered passive blocking as opposed to white noise or frame manipulation but it is blocking regardless. We might want to know the FCC point of view on this before we create “wave free classrooms”! Best, Philippe Philippe Hanset www.eduriam.us<http://www.eduriam.us/> On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Lee H Badman <lhbad...@syr.edu<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu>> wrote: I'm trying to get the FCC's attention on this: https://wirednot.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/an-open-letter-to-the-fcc/ -Lee Lee H. Badman Network Architect/Wireless TME ITS, Syracuse University 315.443.3003 ________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> on behalf of Mike King <m...@mpking.com<mailto:m...@mpking.com>> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 9:01 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 6-month follow-up to Marriott/FCC Wifi blocking stories I know it's two weeks later, but Smart Holdings just got smacked by the FCC for the same thing. (Which is probably why you were asking) http://gizmodo.com/its-about-damn-time-fcc-says-convention-centers-cant-b-1724805719?dfp_pp_ab=on&dfp_desktop_three=off&utm_expid=66866090-43.E9Bjfd6NTuSlXJewu2e_Ig.1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Bob Brown <bbr...@nww.com<mailto:bbr...@nww.com>> wrote: I’m looking to follow up on a series of stories we ran in late 2014/early 2015<http://www.networkworld.com/article/2879142/wireless/fcc-still-has-ton-of-explaining-to-do-on-wi-fi-blocking-rules.html> on the Marriott Wifi blocking issue. To refresh, the FCC fined Marriott for blocking a Wifi hotspot (or hotspots) at one of its hotel convention centers. The incident sparked quite a bit of discussion on this listserv, as university/college network pros wondered whether their own Wifi management/security practices would now be considered legit and whether the products they were using could still be used. *I’ve followed up with Marriott, whose CIO kicked me over to public relations, which naturally declined to comment. *The hospitality industry trade group had said at the time of the FCC/Marriott decisions that it was going to launch a cybersecurity task force to study this topic further, but they haven’t responded to my inquiries, so I’m not sure whether such a task force was formed and if so, whether it has accomplished anything. *The FCC has been unresponsive on this matter entirely. *I’ve contacted WLAN vendors that I spoke to for some of the original articles to see if anything has changed on their end since the start of the year and they haven’t had much to say so far. So, based on all this, I don’t have much of an update to write about at this point…perhaps exactly what these parties would like. But, I’m also wondering if any of you who were trying to figure out earlier this year what the FCC decision/Marriott response meant to you, have taken any new approaches to managing/security Wifi on your campuses. If so, and you’d be willing to share your story, please touch base (or feel free to share with the listserv if appropriate). Regards, Bob Brown Online Executive Editor, News T: 508.766.5418<tel:508.766.5418> LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bobbrownboston> | Twitter: @alphadoggs<https://twitter.com/alphadoggs> | Facebook profile<https://www.facebook.com/NetworkWorld> | Google + profile<https://plus.google.com/104712908618368674642/posts> | Instagram<http://instagram.com/nwwinstagram> NETWORK WORLD 492 Old Connecticut Path | PO Box 9002 | Framingham, MA 01701-9002 NetworkWorld.com<http://www.networkworld.com/> | Media Kit<http://www.networkworldmediakit.com/> | Conferences & Events<http://events.networkworld.com/> An IDG Enterprise<http://www.idgenterprise.com/> Brand ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
