There is going to have to be a compromise here guys. We will not be
putting together the composite subscriber data for the FCC. There are no
provisions for it. We can ask but then quite frankly I am not too keen
on telling them that most of our members here seem to be reluctant to
tell them who they are.
We have to determine how the form has created this belief among you that
the FCC is going to use it for harm. I want to see real answers here and
not just conspiracy theories. If the FCC did not ask for the source of
the information then what would stop us from telling them we had 10
times more customers than we had? There is no accountability if the data
cannot be verified. Why is it assumed by all of you that the same
organization who created unlicensed spectrum policy is now going to find
some way of destroying the industry that was created by that policy:?
Scriv
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Let's just get clear right up front... It appears you believe that
if we
all appear to be good boy scouts and have feel-good politics, we're more
likely to get what we want considered. I disagree. I dont' think
it'll
get us even 3 seconds reconsideration. But I do believe if we make
forceful and logical, and well-reasoned arguments, it far outweighs
whether
or not some of us are more than just a little atagonistic toward being
counted, filed, folded, spindled, and reported.
If we start rolling over now, they will ask for more and more and
more........... If all they want is the number of subs, then lets all
turn info into WISPA and WISPA can give the lump number. Why do they
freakin need to know if I wear boxers or briefs?
Ever heard of http://www.fire-the-senate.com/
It's time for.......
http://www.fire-the-fcc.com/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
