Mac, I have been running in production links and GigE routers since 3.0rc13. Our main edge router is MT v3.1 right now and is running perfectly. I have upgraded about 10 of our RB532's with v3.2 and it has been perfect so far. Some of the new statistics are really cool (like the Potential Throughput display for each connected radio, running "pseudobridge" instead of WDS, etc.)
Travis Microserv Mac Dearman wrote: > Travis, > > > > Do you know anyone that has the new MT v3.x in a production environment? > I have two RB532's that were just configured using Nstream and I am looking > at putting them in a work situation. I too am ordering some 333 and RB600's > if I can find some tonight. The RB532's that are ready to roll are actually > seeing 12.5Mbps FDX with ~62/~63 - - > > > > Let me know how you fair and I will keep you informed. > > > > Thanks, > > Mac > > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Travis Johnson > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:40 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS > > > > Hi, > > 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 5mhz channel, 7.8Mbps one direction > 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 40mhz channel, 52.3Mbps one direction > > All these tests are with Nstreme on, but no framer policy. I know people > have squeezed more by playing with the framer settings, but we have never > needed to do that. > > I'm sure more CPU would help some... but I have no idea how much. I know > even the RB333 boards (same price as the RB532) have twice the CPU power as > the RB532s... and I have some of those on the way already. ;) > > Travis > Microserv > > Jeromie Reeves wrote: > > What about 5mhz channels? Do you have enough signal to try 40 mhz? I > am about to replace 5 links with MT 5.8. Does more CPU help on the > sending side, say P4 to RB133/333. > > On 2/9/08, Travis Johnson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Here is a real world MT test running RB532's (333mhz) with v3.2 OS: > > 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 10mhz channel, 18.3Mbps one direction > 5.8ghz, 9 miles, 20mhz channel, 27.3Mbps one direction > > A more comparable test would be using the new MT RB600 units (as they are > almost exactly the same price as the WAR4 boards). I will get a couple > ordered and deployed so we can do some comparable testing. :) > > Travis > Microserv > > Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > OK, here are some real world examples: > > 5.3ghz 40mhz channel, 8.5 miles. WAR4/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless > Antennas. 50meg one way. > 5.7ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles. WAR2/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless > Antennas. 45meg one way (CPU maxes out on WAR2s) > 5.7ghz 10mhz channel, 42 miles WAR4/SR5 attached to 34db Radiowaves > Antennas. 18meg one way. > FDD 5.2ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles X4000/R52H attached to 29db > Pacwireless/21db MTI panel. > 5.8ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles X4000/R52H attached to 21db > MTI Panel/29db Pacwireless 30 down, 30 up > > for comparison: Motorola Gemini Lite (30meg bh) on the same link - 3meg > down, 3 up > > We have several RB532 backhauls in the air, and even with all the > optimization we can do to them, we never get better than 20 meg in one > direction. Replacing the RB532s with WAR2s (266mhz CPU, comparable to > an RB532) nearly doubles the speed. > > On comparable hardware, I have not come across ANY Mikrotik system that > will keep up with StarOS when it comes to dedicated backhaul. > > Matt Larsen > Inventive Media > > > Mark Nash wrote: > > > 5.3GHz 40MHz channel, 1.5 miles. WAR4-METRO/SR5 inside 24dbi RooTennas. > Testing beyond each ethernet port. 2 weeks non-stop stress-testing after we > installed and before we deployed gave us 70 megs one way. The MRTG graph > looked like a solid block without any deviation. > > Mark Nash > UnwiredWest > 78 Centennial Loop > Suite E > Eugene, OR 97401 > 541-998-5555 > 541-998-5599 fax > http://www.unwiredwest.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mac Dearman" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'WISPA General List'" <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> <wireless@wispa.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS > > > > > > I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both > sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets > get > real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test and "maybe" > if I hold one hand in the air, twist my lips standing on one leg. > > I mean real world - whatcha getting?? Whatcha see and is it a bench test > or > are you in the real WISP world? :) > > > Mac > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:51 PM > To: 'WISPA General List' > Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS > > 50 both ways with N-Stream dual and Turbo mode... > > Dennis M. Burgess > Mikrotik Certified Consultant > Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri > --WISP/Network Support Services-- > +1 314-686-1302 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:46 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS > > Mikrotik can do 70 megs or more over 40 MHz as well. > > > ---------- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
