|
Hi, I just upgraded another link that we have Celeron 1.5ghz boards on each side... going 2 miles: 20mhz channel = 33.2Mbps one direction 40mhz channel = 56.9Mbps one direction I have to say I am truly impressed if the number Matt posted below is correct (and not a typo or something). Getting 45Mbps from 20mhz of spectrum is very impressive. Are you using compression on these links? Travis Microserv Jeromie Reeves wrote: Sounds good. In the next week or two (depends on weather) I will be changing my main links. Good to have some numbers to compare against. I will make a note to post my numbers (P4 to RB133). What about signal levels and mpci cards used? Now if MT would allow different sized NStream2 setups (say 40/5) I would be very happy. Why use all 40/20/10 on the return side, I push 10mbit out but only ~1mb or so back.On 2/9/08, Travis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi, 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 5mhz channel, 7.8Mbps one direction 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 40mhz channel, 52.3Mbps one direction All these tests are with Nstreme on, but no framer policy. I know people have squeezed more by playing with the framer settings, but we have never needed to do that. I'm sure more CPU would help some... but I have no idea how much. I know even the RB333 boards (same price as the RB532) have twice the CPU power as the RB532s... and I have some of those on the way already. ;) Travis Microserv Jeromie Reeves wrote: What about 5mhz channels? Do you have enough signal to try 40 mhz? I am about to replace 5 links with MT 5.8. Does more CPU help on the sending side, say P4 to RB133/333. On 2/9/08, Travis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here is a real world MT test running RB532's (333mhz) with v3.2 OS: 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 10mhz channel, 18.3Mbps one direction 5.8ghz, 9 miles, 20mhz channel, 27.3Mbps one direction A more comparable test would be using the new MT RB600 units (as they are almost exactly the same price as the WAR4 boards). I will get a couple ordered and deployed so we can do some comparable testing. :) Travis Microserv Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: OK, here are some real world examples: 5.3ghz 40mhz channel, 8.5 miles. WAR4/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless Antennas. 50meg one way. 5.7ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles. WAR2/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless Antennas. 45meg one way (CPU maxes out on WAR2s) 5.7ghz 10mhz channel, 42 miles WAR4/SR5 attached to 34db Radiowaves Antennas. 18meg one way. FDD 5.2ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles X4000/R52H attached to 29db Pacwireless/21db MTI panel. 5.8ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles X4000/R52H attached to 21db MTI Panel/29db Pacwireless 30 down, 30 up for comparison: Motorola Gemini Lite (30meg bh) on the same link - 3meg down, 3 up We have several RB532 backhauls in the air, and even with all the optimization we can do to them, we never get better than 20 meg in one direction. Replacing the RB532s with WAR2s (266mhz CPU, comparable to an RB532) nearly doubles the speed. On comparable hardware, I have not come across ANY Mikrotik system that will keep up with StarOS when it comes to dedicated backhaul. Matt Larsen Inventive Media Mark Nash wrote: 5.3GHz 40MHz channel, 1.5 miles. WAR4-METRO/SR5 inside 24dbi RooTennas. Testing beyond each ethernet port. 2 weeks non-stop stress-testing after we installed and before we deployed gave us 70 megs one way. The MRTG graph looked like a solid block without any deviation. Mark Nash UnwiredWest 78 Centennial Loop Suite E Eugene, OR 97401 541-998-5555 541-998-5599 fax http://www.unwiredwest.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test and "maybe" if I hold one hand in the air, twist my lips standing on one leg. I mean real world - whatcha getting?? Whatcha see and is it a bench test or are you in the real WISP world? :) Mac -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:51 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS 50 both ways with N-Stream dual and Turbo mode... Dennis M. Burgess Mikrotik Certified Consultant Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri --WISP/Network Support Services-- +1 314-686-1302 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:46 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Mikrotik can do 70 megs or more over 40 MHz as well. ---------- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
