Chuck, Vegetation might have a huge impact on the coverage area. I've seen pictures of your area, it looks like heaven to me. My experience is that the first two trees will eat up a 5.8 signal, so expanding the coverage area by 80% just adds another tree or two.
It might be very sensible for Kurt (?) to use the coax rather than put a little more signal into a bunch of foliage. On August 20, at 10:14 AM August 20, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote: > 130 feet on 5.8 through LMR 900 = serving about 20% of the area you > could > serve if the coax was not in place. > I guess it depends on what folks call "working". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
