The internet is NOT a big truck.  It's a series of tubes!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Schmidt
<jeschm...@jeschmidt.com>wrote:

> I read a survey not long ago (sorry, can't find it) that showed that, by
> far, the most important factor in "broadband" access was always-on as
> opposed to interrupting your phone service, waiting a minute before you
> can browse, etc.  This was a survey of folks who had broadband.
>
> I manage my Medicare on line, obtain renewals for driver's license and
> auto registrations, pay my property taxes, and save the government lots
> and lots of money by doing those activities myself.  There are many
> reasons the government is actively promoting universal, convenient
> Internet access.
>
> I have both "speed boost" RoadRunner cable HSD service and 768K DSL as an
> automatic (lower metric on my router) backup and can say that it's not a
> disaster when RoadRunner goes down although it is certainly
> noticeable...especially if I go to YouTube.  It's not RoadRunner's fault
> that we live in more rural settings with a really perpendicular vertical
> utility pole very unusual...most are off up to 10 degrees and wiggle a
> lot.
>
> Back to broadband; A 1Mbps service that's always on would allow students
> to do their school work, allow on-line government activities, let you
> check the weather, etc., and, although not zippy, it is quite functional
> and certainly would permit the do-it-yourself governmental activities
> without the problems with dial-up.
>
> However, the acceleration of the availability of facilities that only work
> well at 10Mbps and above is happening very fast and I wouldn't be
> surprised that students in K-12 as well as universities will soon be
> required to watch video teaching aids that will demand that.
>
> By the way, I have been getting 1Mbps tethered from my laptop through my
> AT&T 3G phone service for several years, as well.  It's $15 a month with
> no consumption limit.  The latency makes it a bit of a sporty course to
> use, however.
>
> Now, put all that together, all those speeds, all the vehicles (Cable,
> WISP, DSL, and 3G), and comparisons with countries where people are
> crammed together cheek to jowl instead of your neighbor being on the
> opposite side of a mountain the size of Sweden and, furthermore, imagine
> an FCC bureaucrat facing a technically-challenged congressman...
>
> Well, the problem speaks for itself.
>
> . . . j o n a t h a n
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Curtis Maurand
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:06 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Says Fixed Wireless Only Delivers 1 Mbps
>
> Jack Unger wrote:
> > Hi Victoria,
> >
> > The FCC Workship "1 Mbps" statement is very, very generalized. It's
> > nothing to get upset about.
> >
> > If we want the FCC to update their knowledge about WISPs then we need
> > to educate the FCC. We DO educate them with every FCC filing and
> > presentation that we make. In the last year, we've made about a dozen
> > written filings plus an in-person presentations to four of the five
> > previous FCC Commissioners and to the FCC OET staff. Keep in mind that
> > everything we write or present becomes a part of the public record.
> >
> > WISPA's FCC Committee is working on writing and filing FCC Comments
> > right now, at this very moment. This filing is in response to an FCC
> > "Notice of Inquiry" (NOI) about "advanced telecommunications services"
> > and "broadband". The NOI asks whether broadband is being deployed to
> > all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion. The NOI asks five
> > "core questions".
>
> Ooh.  Ooh.  This is easy.  :-)
> >
> > (1) How should we define "advanced telecommunications capability" or
> > "broadband?" *(NOTE:  The FCC is asking about "speed" here)*
> A reasonable enduser experience with websites like YouTube, Hulu or BBC
> without too much finger drumming.
> >
> > (2) Is broadband available to all Americans?
> >
> No
> >
> > (3) Is the current level of broadband deployment reasonable and timely?
> >
> No
> >
> > (4) What actions, if any, should the Commission take to accelerate
> > broadband deployment?
> >
> This one is harder.  If we want to perpetuate the duopoly system that
> dominiates the urban/suburban landscape, then:
> Mandate that 100% of America (and territories) be covered, with a
> deadline for compliance and stiff fines for non-complience.
> Otherwise, huge tax breaks for the little guy (read WISP) to get the job
> done.  If you're a company with over 50 employees, no tax break.
> >
> > (5) What actions should the Commission take to improve its regular
> > broadband data collection efforts?
> >
> >
> Help the little guy, because he's the one who'll serve where the duopoly
> won't.
>
>
> duopoly = CATV monopoly plus ILEC.
>
> --C
> > We've got to be a little careful about how we ask the FCC to define
> > broadband because:
> >
> > 1. If we set the bar too high, for example by saying that "broadband"
> > is 5 Mbps or more then we risk excluding WISPs who do not provide at
> > least 5 Mbps. They may not be eligible for funding or may not even be
> > considered legitimate WISPs.
> >
> > 2. Some WISPs do not understand the difference between "raw" data rate
> > and actual throughput and we don't want one WISP's lack of
> > understanding to distort the FCC's definitions of "broadband".
> >
> > 3. Some WISPs do not understand that throughput is shared between all
> > of the active customers on an AP at any given moment. Even if an AP is
> > capable of delivering 10 Mbps of actual throughput, when 30 customers
> > are active then less than 333k (10 Meg divided by 30) is available to
> > each customer, sometimes far less. We don't want to let the fact that
> > available throughput per customer is usually less than the maximum
> > single-customer throughput to distort the FCC's definition of
> > "broadband".
> >
> > In conclusion, I think it's better to let the FCC set the broadband
> > "bar" a little low so we have a chance to demonstrate that we can
> > sometimes exceed it rather than let some WISP who is bragging about
> > speeds that he may or may actually be able to deliver cause the FCC to
> > set the broadband "bar" too high so that the FCC writes unrealistic
> > regulations (or the NITA and RUS originate unrealistic grant programs)
> > that either ignore or exclude the needs of the majority of WISPs.
> >
> > Jack Unger
> > Chair - WISPA FCC Committee
> >
> >
> > St. Louis Broadband wrote:
> >> They are not getting it from my form 477.
> >> The only 1 Mbps service we offer is upload and that is with a 5 Mbps
> >> download.
> >>
> >> Victoria
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Jason Hensley
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:01 AM
> >> To: 'WISPA General List'
> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Says Fixed Wireless Only Delivers 1 Mbps
> >>
> >> Hmm, so I guess my 10Mbps down and 8mbps up wireless links (yes, to
> >> customers) don't count????
> >>
> >> My guess, though, is that they're pulling this data from the 477 and
> making
> >> assumptions based on that.  Most of our customers are 1.5Mbps or less
> >> customers so looking at the "raw" 477 data then yes, it would appear
> that we
> >> may not be doing much more than the 1.5meg.
> >>
> >> Interesting...
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Lists
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 7:54 AM
> >> To: 'WISPA General List'
> >> Subject: [WISPA] FCC Says Fixed Wireless Only Delivers 1 Mbps
> >>
> >> This really ticks me off:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Wireless broadband Internet access services offered over fixed
> networks
> >> allow consumers to access the Internet from a fixed point while
> stationary
> >>
> >>  and often require a direct line-of-sight between the wireless
> transmitter
> >> and receiver. These services have been offered using both licensed
> spectrum
> >>
> >> and unlicensed devices. For example, thousands of small Wireless
> Internet
> >> Services Providers (WISPs) provide such wireless broadband at speeds of
>
> >>
> >> around one Mbps using unlicensed devices, often in rural areas not
> served by
> >> cable or wireline broadband networks."
> >>
> >> http://www.broadband.gov/broadband_types.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I talked to them at the NTIA workshop in Memphis about this, but they
> are
> >> still defaming our industry.
> >>
> >> I have emailed them at the broadband.gov site and think it is a good
> idea
> >> that they hear from more of us.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Victoria Proffer  - President/CEO
> >>
> >> StLouisBroadband.com <http://stlbroadband.com/>
> >>
> >>  <http://showmebroadband.com/> ShowMeBroadband.com
> >>
> >> Rural Missouri Wireless Project.
> >>
> >> 314.974.5600 * Fax 573.747.4756
> >>
> >> Follow us on Twitter.com @stlbroadband
> >>
> >> SBA Certified WOSB
> >>
> >> STLBBLogo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> >> ----
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> >> ----
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
> > Author - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
> > Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
> > www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com
> > Public Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to