I can't look again because I just dropped it off at UPS to go back for RMA.
I had never opened this one until now, but the board say 433 and the case
says 433AH.  I bought a 433AH
Is the board in a 433AH board marked as such or do they all say 433?


-----Original Message-----
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices

The FCC logo on the RB433AH is right next to the "CE" logo just to the 
left of the two (ram?) chips about 2/3 of the way down the board.



ralph wrote:
> I don't see anything like that on the pdf you referred to.
> I have in my hand a 433AH in a case that came from a well known supplier
of
> pre-cased RBs
> There are no markings on the case about compliance with any rule or any
FCC
> numbers at all.
> There is nothing that says FCC on the top of the RB inside either.  I did
> not remove the board and look underneath.
>
> As far as where you go to see if it is certified or not, I don't know all
> the places, but there is usually a sticker that gives the details about
the
> certification.
> You can also check the FCC filing, which I believe even shows replicas of
> the sticker. I think the user's manual also mentions the approval.
>
> The Crossroads FCC filing shows the sticker and its placement. 
>
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/blobs/retrieve.cgi?attachment_id=82
> 9435&native_or_pdf=pdf
>
> The user's manual has an entire page dedicated to the FCC data including
all
> the warnings on page 11
>
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/blobs/retrieve.cgi?attachment_id=82
> 9433&native_or_pdf=pdf
>
>
>
> Mikrotik has very little stuff certified. Most of the listings are for the
> same devices, just certified on different frequencies or in different
> configurations.
> There are the 2 things I already mentioned, as well as these:
>
> R5H (a radio card only)  photos show it in a routerboard being used as a
> "test fixture" but test was only for the card, and an FCC label must be
> placed on the outside of the final enclosure.  Actually the same as
> WLM54AGP23  but FCC shown so record of this device.
>
> R52 : This module is intended for OEM integrator. The OEM integrator is
> still responsible
> for the FCC compliance requirement of the end product, which integrates
this
> module.
>
>
> So if you go and put an R52 in anything, it becomes *your* responsibility
to
> the FCC to maintain compliance.  MT appears to be pretty much immune to
> citations on this issue.   One could conclude that someone like Dennis
> probably operates this way.
>
> It isn't just MT. The Williboard stuff (when assembled by Deliberant or
> Ligowave) becomes certified too.
>
> I also seem to remember that the Pronghorn Metro stuff has do it yourself
> instructions showing exactly how to build the unit so it is just like the
> one they had certified, right down to the internal pigtail.
>
> I can't locate my StarOS equipment to see what they did, but something is
> telling me that they have the proper stickers too.  I'd have to check, or
> maybe Lonnie can address the issue.
>
> It would really be nice to draw together a list of just which equipment
was
> and was not.  Some folks would care I think. 
> Of course from what I have read and seen over the years, many of you do
not
> care whether or not you are operating legally.
>
> I'm not trying to start anything- just stating the facts as I see 'em.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:31 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> What does the FCC symbol stamped on my RB433AH signify?  (see 
> http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/rb433ah.pdf)
>
> Where does one look to see what devices are FCC part-15 Class A and B 
> certified?
>
> Randy
>
> Mike Hammett wrote:
>   
>> An RB411 does not have onboard wireless at all, only a mPCI.  A
crossroads
>>     
>
>   
>> does, however.
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "ralph" <ralphli...@bsrg.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:22 PM
>> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Don't forget that routerboard is a computer. It does more than enable
the
>>> wireless card.
>>> It needs to have a Part 15 computing device certification as well, just 
>>> like
>>> your PC.
>>>
>>> So regardless of the radio card and the antenna and any of the rest of
>>>       
> the
>   
>>> things that people are disagreeing on, it still boils down to a fine for

>>> the
>>> user if the RB causes interference and is found to be not certified.  If
>>> some of you were around when PC clones were being first built, we had 
>>> these
>>> computer shows and fairs and even some Hamfests where the local pc 
>>> builders
>>> were showing their wares.  A popular PC case was a convenient flip top
>>> affair that allowed easy access to the cards inside without using
screws.
>>> The FCC made many a visit to these shows, shutting down and fining the
>>> builders of these systems. They did not build the motherboard and they
>>>       
> did
>   
>>> not build the case, they just *assembled* it, just like you folks are 
>>> doing
>>> with the Mikrotik stuff.
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell from the FCC info, only 2 routerboards have any FCC
>>> Part 15 Class A or B computing device approval.
>>> They are the Crossroads and the RB411- both of which already have on
>>>       
> board
>   
>>> wireless.
>>>
>>> I will quote part 15.3 here and you can decide whether or not your
>>> routerboards are required to be certified.
>>> If I were you, I would demand that MT have all their computing devices
>>> certified.
>>>
>>> =======
>>> Digital device:ยง 15.3 (k) Digital device. (Previously defined as a 
>>> computing
>>> device). An unintentional radiator (device or system) that generates and
>>> uses timing signals or pulses at a rate in excess of 9,000 pulses
>>>       
> (cycles)
>   
>>> per second and uses digital techniques; inclusive of telephone equipment
>>> that uses digital techniques or any device or system that generates and 
>>> uses
>>> radio frequency energy for the purpose of performing data processing
>>> functions, such as electronic computations, operations, transformations,
>>> recording, filing, sorting, storage, retrieval, or transfer. A radio
>>> frequency device that is specifically subject to an emanation
requirement
>>>       
>
>   
>>> in
>>> any other FCC Rule Part or an intentional radiator subject to Subpart C
>>>       
> of
>   
>>> this Part that contains a digital device is not subject to the standards

>>> for
>>> digital devices, provided the digital device is used only to enable
>>> operation of the radio frequency device and the digital device does not
>>> control additional functions or capabilities. Note: Computer terminals
>>>       
> and
>   
>>> peripherals that are intended to be connected to a computer are digital
>>> devices.
>>>
>>>
>>> Class A digital device: A Class "A" digital device is a digital device 
>>> that
>>> is marketed for use in a commercial, industrial or business environment.
>>>
>>> Class B digital device: A Class "B" digital device is a digital device 
>>> that
>>> is marketed for use in a residential environment. Examples of such
>>>       
> devices
>   
>>> include, but are not limited to, personal computers, calculators, and
>>> similar electronic devices that are marketed for use by the general 
>>> public.
>>> Class B equipment, intended for use in a residential environment where
>>>       
> the
>   
>>> likelihood of RFI is greater, must meet much stricter RF emission limits
>>> than the Class A devices.
>>> =======
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:32 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>>
>>> The way I understand it, the routerboard don't matter, the antenna, and
>>> radio matters, as its certified as a system, with xx gain of this type
>>> of antenna.  You also have to have the FCC information, etc, on the
>>> outside that MT offers to only its distributors.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 6:12 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>>
>>> That's been the ongoing argument.
>>>
>>> I use the analogy of a PCMCIA or USB card. that's the device that is FCC
>>> certified - the computer (routerboard) just runs it.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:53 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>>
>>> Excuse my ignorance but since the card is the only thing that
>>> transmits why does the board and especially why does the enclosure
>>> need to be certified? If one puts a two way radio in a car the radio
>>> needs to be certified, not the whole car.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 8:30 PM, ralph wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Pretty broad statement: "MT is FCC Certified :)"
>>>> Yes, I believe the wireless cards themselves might be- but even if
>>>> they are,
>>>> that does not an FCC certified system make.
>>>> Please give me some FCC registration numbers of certified systems.
>>>> Something
>>>> like the RB/card/enclosure combination.
>>>> Maybe someone built a system and had it tested and received a number
>>>> for
>>>> *that system*.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:00 PM
>>>> To: WISPA General List
>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>>>
>>>> MT is FCC Certified :)
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
>>>> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
>>>> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>>>> WISPA Vendor Member
>>>> Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>>>> LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
>>>> Author of "Learn RouterOS"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of ralph
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 10:57 AM
>>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>>>
>>>> Marlon-
>>>> You asked, and you probably already know what I will say
>>>>
>>>> Airaya and others: FCC Certified
>>>> Mikrotik- Not so much
>>>> It all depends on if you want to be legal or not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you want 802.11, then look at the Ubiquiti Powerstation. Seems to
>>>> work
>>>> fine for us, just don't mount it outside.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:19 AM
>>>> To: WISPA General List
>>>> Subject: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I have to upgrade a couple of backhaul systems and I'm wondering what
>>>> others
>>>>
>>>> are using.
>>>>
>>>> I've got Airaya gear in place.  I've LOVED it.  That's been some of
>>>> the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>> reliable gear that I've ever used.
>>>>
>>>> I also like my Mikrotik hardware so far.  We've put quite a bit of
>>>> it in
>>>>
>>>> over the last year or so.
>>>>
>>>> Both of the links I'm going to replace are indoor units with coax to
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>> outdoor antennas.  So no fancy weather issues to deal with.
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to go with Airaya again.  But the MT hardware to do
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>> same job is about 20% of the cost last time I checked.  I hate to go
>>>> too
>>>>
>>>> cheap, but I hate to spend too much for no gain.....  What are you
>>>> guys
>>>> using these days?  Again, the antennas and such are already in place,
>>>> all I
>>>> need to replace is the indoor ratios.
>>>>
>>>> Why would you install what you put in?
>>>>
>>>> laters,
>>>> marlon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> ----
>>>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> ----
>>>> ----
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> --------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> --------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> ----
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>>> ----
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>>>       
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>>> ----
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>   
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>>>       
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>   
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>   
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>>     
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>   
>>  
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>   
>>     
>
>   

-- 
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc

work: 435-773-6071
email: rco...@infowest.com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/randycosby



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to